Compare-Cities.com
Compare Elk Grove to South San Francisco
This post compares Elk Grove, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Elk Grove (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 166,228 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $60,199 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 45% | 33% |
| Black | 11% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 39% |
| With Kids | 45% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 36 | 39 |
| Rentals | 27% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Elk Grove or South San Francisco?
A: Elk Grove has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 166228 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Elk Grove or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Elk Grove.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Elk Grove or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Elk Grove.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 27% for Elk Grove versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Elk Grove may include: Vineyard, American-Canyon, and Lakewood.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z