Compare-Cities.com
Compare El Monte to South Pasadena
This post compares El Monte, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | El Monte (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,958 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $27,052 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $401,000 | $928,500 |
| White | 45% | 54% |
| Black | 0% | 3% |
| Asian | 29% | 29% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 59% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, El Monte or South Pasadena?
A: El Monte has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 115958 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in El Monte or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in El Monte.
Q: Are homes more expensive in El Monte or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in El Monte.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: El Monte does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 59% for El Monte versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to El Monte may include: Stanton, Garden-Grove, and Buena-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z