Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eastvale to South San Francisco
This post compares Eastvale, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eastvale (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,733 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $61,490 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $496,000 | $697,400 |
| White | 42% | 33% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 26% | 39% |
| With Kids | 57% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 39 |
| Rentals | 24% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eastvale or South San Francisco?
A: Eastvale has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 59733 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eastvale or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Eastvale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eastvale or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eastvale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Eastvale versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eastvale may include: Lathrop, American-Canyon, and Vineyard.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z