Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eastvale to South Pasadena
This post compares Eastvale, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Eastvale (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 59,733 | 25,974 |
Income (median) | $61,490 | $74,034 |
Home Value (median) | $496,000 | $928,500 |
White | 42% | 54% |
Black | 8% | 3% |
Asian | 26% | 29% |
With Kids | 57% | 34% |
Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
Rentals | 24% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eastvale or South Pasadena?
A: Eastvale has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 59733 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eastvale or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eastvale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eastvale or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eastvale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Eastvale versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eastvale may include: Lathrop, American-Canyon, and Vineyard.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z