Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eastvale to Laguna Hills
This post compares Eastvale, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eastvale (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,733 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $61,490 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $496,000 | $649,700 |
| White | 42% | 69% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 26% | 14% |
| With Kids | 57% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 41 |
| Rentals | 24% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eastvale or Laguna Hills?
A: Eastvale has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 59733 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eastvale or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Eastvale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eastvale or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eastvale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Laguna Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Eastvale versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eastvale may include: Lathrop, American-Canyon, and Vineyard.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z