Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eastvale to Foster City
This post compares Eastvale, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Eastvale (city) | Foster City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 59,733 | 33,529 |
Income (median) | $61,490 | $105,889 |
Home Value (median) | $496,000 | $1,051,000 |
White | 42% | 43% |
Black | 8% | 2% |
Asian | 26% | 47% |
With Kids | 57% | 33% |
Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
Rentals | 24% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eastvale or Foster City?
A: Eastvale has a larger population count than Foster City: 59733 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eastvale or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eastvale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eastvale or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eastvale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Eastvale versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eastvale may include: Lathrop, American-Canyon, and Vineyard.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z