Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eastvale to Foothill Farms
This post compares Eastvale, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eastvale (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,733 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $61,490 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $496,000 | $201,200 |
| White | 42% | 67% |
| Black | 8% | 9% |
| Asian | 26% | 5% |
| With Kids | 57% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 33 |
| Rentals | 24% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eastvale or Foothill Farms?
A: Eastvale has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 59733 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eastvale or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Eastvale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eastvale or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Eastvale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Eastvale versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eastvale may include: Lathrop, American-Canyon, and Vineyard.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z