Compare-Cities.com
Compare East Los Angeles to South San Francisco
This post compares East Los Angeles, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | East Los Angeles (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 123,905 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $29,480 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $349,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 48% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 39% |
| With Kids | 47% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 67% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, East Los Angeles or South San Francisco?
A: East Los Angeles has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 123905 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in East Los Angeles or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in East Los Angeles.
Q: Are homes more expensive in East Los Angeles or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in East Los Angeles.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: East Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 67% for East Los Angeles versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to East Los Angeles may include: Watsonville, Lennox, and Salinas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z