Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dinuba to Foothill Farms
This post compares Dinuba, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dinuba (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,712 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $30,873 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $164,800 | $201,200 |
| White | 80% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 2% | 5% |
| With Kids | 53% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 33 |
| Rentals | 49% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dinuba or Foothill Farms?
A: Dinuba has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 23712 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dinuba or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Dinuba.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dinuba or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Dinuba.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Dinuba does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 49% for Dinuba versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dinuba may include: Selma, Madera, and Porterville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z