Compare-Cities.com
Compare Desert Hot Springs to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Desert Hot Springs, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Desert Hot Springs (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,298 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $32,379 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $154,600 | $322,800 |
| White | 70% | 36% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 10% |
| With Kids | 40% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 56% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Desert Hot Springs or South San Jose Hills?
A: Desert Hot Springs has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 28298 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Desert Hot Springs or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Desert Hot Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Desert Hot Springs or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Desert Hot Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Desert Hot Springs versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Desert Hot Springs may include: Lompoc, Foothill-Farms, and Port-Hueneme.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z