Compare-Cities.com
Compare Desert Hot Springs to Burbank
This post compares Desert Hot Springs, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Desert Hot Springs (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,298 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $32,379 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $154,600 | $574,300 |
| White | 70% | 70% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 11% |
| With Kids | 40% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 56% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Desert Hot Springs or Burbank?
A: Desert Hot Springs has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 28298 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Desert Hot Springs or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Desert Hot Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Desert Hot Springs or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Desert Hot Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 56% for Desert Hot Springs versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Desert Hot Springs may include: Lompoc, Foothill-Farms, and Port-Hueneme.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z