Compare-Cities.com
Compare Desert Hot Springs to Altadena
This post compares Desert Hot Springs, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Desert Hot Springs (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,298 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $32,379 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $154,600 | $649,800 |
| White | 70% | 53% |
| Black | 7% | 22% |
| Asian | 2% | 6% |
| With Kids | 40% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 43 |
| Rentals | 56% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Desert Hot Springs or Altadena?
A: Desert Hot Springs has a smaller population count than Altadena: 28298 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Desert Hot Springs or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Desert Hot Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Desert Hot Springs or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Desert Hot Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 56% for Desert Hot Springs versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Desert Hot Springs may include: Lompoc, Foothill-Farms, and Port-Hueneme.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z