Compare-Cities.com
Compare Delano to Foothill Farms
This post compares Delano, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Delano (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,709 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $30,330 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $167,900 | $201,200 |
| White | 71% | 67% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 11% | 5% |
| With Kids | 57% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 40% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Delano or Foothill Farms?
A: Delano has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 52709 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Delano or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Delano.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Delano or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Delano.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Delano versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Delano may include: Ceres, Selma, and Wasco.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z