Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Dana Point, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $322,800 |
| White | 83% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 10% |
| With Kids | 22% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 32 |
| Rentals | 39% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or South San Jose Hills?
A: Dana Point has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 34028 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Dana Point does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Dana Point versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z