Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to South San Francisco
This post compares Dana Point, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 83% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 22% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 39 |
| Rentals | 39% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or South San Francisco?
A: Dana Point has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 34028 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Dana Point does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Dana Point versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z