Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to South Pasadena
This post compares Dana Point, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $928,500 |
| White | 83% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 3% | 29% |
| With Kids | 22% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 40 |
| Rentals | 39% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or South Pasadena?
A: Dana Point has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 34028 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Dana Point versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z