Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to San Francisco
This post compares Dana Point, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $927,400 |
| White | 83% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 3% | 34% |
| With Kids | 22% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 38 |
| Rentals | 39% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or San Francisco?
A: Dana Point has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 34028 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Dana Point versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z