Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to Pittsburg
This post compares Dana Point, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $324,500 |
| White | 83% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 16% |
| Asian | 3% | 17% |
| With Kids | 22% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 35 |
| Rentals | 39% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or Pittsburg?
A: Dana Point has a much smaller population count than Pittsburg: 34028 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Dana Point versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z