Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to Pico Rivera
This post compares Dana Point, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $380,200 |
| White | 83% | 55% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 3% | 3% |
| With Kids | 22% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 36 |
| Rentals | 39% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or Pico Rivera?
A: Dana Point has a smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 34028 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Dana Point does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Dana Point versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z