Compare-Cities.com
Compare Dana Point to Pacifica
This post compares Dana Point, California to Pacifica, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Dana Point (city) | Pacifica (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,028 | 39,141 |
| Income (median) | $70,677 | $68,966 |
| Home Value (median) | $833,800 | $740,700 |
| White | 83% | 63% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 3% | 19% |
| With Kids | 22% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 42 |
| Rentals | 39% | 31% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Dana Point or Pacifica?
A: Dana Point has a similar population count than Pacifica: 34028 compared with 39141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Dana Point or in Pacifica?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Dana Point.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Dana Point or Pacifica?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Dana Point.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Dana Point does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Dana Point versus 31% for Pacifica.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Dana Point may include: Walnut-Creek, Novato, and San-Clemente.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z