Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to South San Francisco
This post compares Culver City, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $697,400 |
| White | 62% | 33% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 15% | 39% |
| With Kids | 27% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or South San Francisco?
A: Culver City has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 39432 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z