Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to San Francisco
This post compares Culver City, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $927,400 |
| White | 62% | 47% |
| Black | 7% | 5% |
| Asian | 15% | 34% |
| With Kids | 27% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 38 |
| Rentals | 46% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or San Francisco?
A: Culver City has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 39432 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z