Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to San Fernando
This post compares Culver City, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $370,300 |
| White | 62% | 57% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 1% |
| With Kids | 27% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or San Fernando?
A: Culver City has a larger population count than San Fernando: 39432 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Culver City versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z