Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Riverbank
This post compares Culver City, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $247,200 |
| White | 62% | 79% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 27% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
| Rentals | 46% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Riverbank?
A: Culver City has a larger population count than Riverbank: 39432 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z