Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Ridgecrest
This post compares Culver City, California to Ridgecrest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Culver City (city) | Ridgecrest (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,432 | 28,728 |
Income (median) | $65,816 | $53,642 |
Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $169,500 |
White | 62% | 74% |
Black | 7% | 5% |
Asian | 15% | 6% |
With Kids | 27% | 33% |
Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
Rentals | 46% | 37% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Ridgecrest?
A: Culver City has a larger population count than Ridgecrest: 39432 compared with 28728 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Ridgecrest?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Ridgecrest?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 37% for Ridgecrest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z