Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Culver City, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $444,200 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 15% | 13% |
| With Kids | 27% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 35 |
| Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Culver City has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 39432 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z