Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Pico Rivera
This post compares Culver City, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $380,200 |
| White | 62% | 55% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 3% |
| With Kids | 27% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 36 |
| Rentals | 46% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Pico Rivera?
A: Culver City has a smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 39432 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z