Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Foothill Farms
This post compares Culver City, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $201,200 |
| White | 62% | 67% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 15% | 5% |
| With Kids | 27% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Foothill Farms?
A: Culver City has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 39432 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Culver City versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z