Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Corona
This post compares Culver City, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $411,600 |
| White | 62% | 66% |
| Black | 7% | 5% |
| Asian | 15% | 11% |
| With Kids | 27% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 34 |
| Rentals | 46% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Corona?
A: Culver City has a much smaller population count than Corona: 39432 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z