Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Burbank
This post compares Culver City, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $574,300 |
| White | 62% | 70% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 15% | 11% |
| With Kids | 27% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Burbank?
A: Culver City has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 39432 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z