Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Beverly Hills
This post compares Culver City, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 62% | 82% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 9% |
| With Kids | 27% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
| Rentals | 46% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Beverly Hills?
A: Culver City has a similar population count than Beverly Hills: 39432 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z