Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Belmont
This post compares Culver City, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 27% |
| With Kids | 27% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Belmont?
A: Culver City has a larger population count than Belmont: 39432 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Culver City versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z