Compare-Cities.com
Compare Culver City to Bakersfield
This post compares Culver City, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Culver City (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,432 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $65,816 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $735,600 | $228,400 |
| White | 62% | 68% |
| Black | 7% | 7% |
| Asian | 15% | 7% |
| With Kids | 27% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 30 |
| Rentals | 46% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Culver City or Bakersfield?
A: Culver City has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 39432 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Culver City or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Culver City.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Culver City or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Culver City.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Culver City versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Culver City may include: Campbell, San-Rafael, and Monrovia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z