Compare-Cities.com
Compare Cudahy to South San Francisco
This post compares Cudahy, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Cudahy (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,146 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $26,980 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $327,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 77% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 60% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 27 | 39 |
| Rentals | 85% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Cudahy or South San Francisco?
A: Cudahy has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 24146 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Cudahy or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Cudahy.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Cudahy or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Cudahy.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 85% for Cudahy versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Cudahy may include: Bell-Gardens, Maywood, and Bell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z