Compare-Cities.com
Compare Cudahy to Chino Hills
This post compares Cudahy, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Cudahy (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,146 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $26,980 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $327,500 | $567,200 |
| White | 77% | 46% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 0% | 33% |
| With Kids | 60% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 27 | 38 |
| Rentals | 85% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Cudahy or Chino Hills?
A: Cudahy has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 24146 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Cudahy or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Cudahy.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Cudahy or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Cudahy.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 85% for Cudahy versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Cudahy may include: Bell-Gardens, Maywood, and Bell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z