Compare-Cities.com
Compare Cudahy to Beverly Hills
This post compares Cudahy, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Cudahy (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,146 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $26,980 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $327,500 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 77% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 0% | 9% |
| With Kids | 60% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 27 | 43 |
| Rentals | 85% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Cudahy or Beverly Hills?
A: Cudahy has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 24146 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Cudahy or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Cudahy.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Cudahy or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Cudahy.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 85% for Cudahy versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Cudahy may include: Bell-Gardens, Maywood, and Bell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z