Compare-Cities.com
Compare Cudahy to Bakersfield
This post compares Cudahy, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Cudahy (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,146 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $26,980 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $327,500 | $228,400 |
| White | 77% | 68% |
| Black | 0% | 7% |
| Asian | 0% | 7% |
| With Kids | 60% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 27 | 30 |
| Rentals | 85% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Cudahy or Bakersfield?
A: Cudahy has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 24146 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Cudahy or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Cudahy.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Cudahy or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Cudahy.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 85% for Cudahy versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Cudahy may include: Bell-Gardens, Maywood, and Bell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z