Compare-Cities.com
Compare Costa Mesa to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Costa Mesa, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Costa Mesa (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,930 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $51,033 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $671,800 | $322,800 |
| White | 70% | 36% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 8% | 10% |
| With Kids | 30% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 60% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Costa Mesa or South San Jose Hills?
A: Costa Mesa has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 112930 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Costa Mesa or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Costa Mesa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Costa Mesa or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Costa Mesa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Costa Mesa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Costa Mesa versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Costa Mesa may include: Burbank, Goleta, and La-Mesa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z