Compare-Cities.com
Compare Costa Mesa to Laguna Hills
This post compares Costa Mesa, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Costa Mesa (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,930 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $51,033 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $671,800 | $649,700 |
| White | 70% | 69% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 8% | 14% |
| With Kids | 30% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 41 |
| Rentals | 60% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Costa Mesa or Laguna Hills?
A: Costa Mesa has a larger population count than Laguna Hills: 112930 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Costa Mesa or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Costa Mesa.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Costa Mesa or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Costa Mesa.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Costa Mesa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Costa Mesa versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Costa Mesa may include: Burbank, Goleta, and La-Mesa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z