Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Walnut Creek
This post compares Corona, California to Walnut Creek, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Walnut Creek (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 68,516 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $84,028 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $704,900 |
| White | 66% | 76% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 14% |
| With Kids | 40% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 48 |
| Rentals | 35% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Walnut Creek?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Walnut Creek: 163585 compared with 68516 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Walnut Creek?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Walnut Creek?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walnut Creek does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 36% for Walnut Creek.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z