Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Corona, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $322,800 |
| White | 66% | 36% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 10% |
| With Kids | 40% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 35% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or South San Jose Hills?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 163585 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z