Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to South Pasadena
This post compares Corona, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 66% | 54% |
| Black | 5% | 3% |
| Asian | 11% | 29% |
| With Kids | 40% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 35% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or South Pasadena?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 163585 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z