Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Corona, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $374,600 |
| White | 66% | 81% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 3% |
| With Kids | 40% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 35% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 163585 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z