Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to San Francisco
This post compares Corona, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $927,400 |
| White | 66% | 47% |
| Black | 5% | 5% |
| Asian | 11% | 34% |
| With Kids | 40% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 35% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or San Francisco?
A: Corona has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 163585 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z