Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to San Fernando
This post compares Corona, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $370,300 |
| White | 66% | 57% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 1% |
| With Kids | 40% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 35% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or San Fernando?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than San Fernando: 163585 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Fernando does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z