Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to San Bruno
This post compares Corona, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $754,700 |
| White | 66% | 49% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 28% |
| With Kids | 40% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or San Bruno?
A: Corona has a larger population count than San Bruno: 163585 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z