Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Riverbank
This post compares Corona, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $247,200 |
| White | 66% | 79% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 11% | 4% |
| With Kids | 40% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 35% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Riverbank?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 163585 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z