Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Redlands
This post compares Corona, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $350,900 |
| White | 66% | 71% |
| Black | 5% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 7% |
| With Kids | 40% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Redlands?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Redlands: 163585 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z