Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Corona, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $444,200 |
| White | 66% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 40% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Corona has a similar population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 163585 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z