Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Porterville
This post compares Corona, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $163,100 |
| White | 66% | 77% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 11% | 4% |
| With Kids | 40% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 30 |
| Rentals | 35% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Porterville?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Porterville: 163585 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z